The sports world is buzzing about the contrasting intensity of hockey’s 4 Nations Face-Off compared to the lackluster NBA All-Star Game. On Tuesday morning’s Get Up, ESPN NHL analyst P.K. Subban sent a vital message to basketball’s biggest stars about what they could learn from their hockey counterparts. When asked about a proposed USA vs The World format for the NBA All-Star Game, which has support from Giannis Antetokounmpo, Subban seized the moment to engage in a hockey versus basketball culture war, delivering some impactful words for the NBA’s elite in a segment likely to draw attention from fans of both sports.
.@PKSubban1 weighs in on if the NHL could inspire the NBA to change the All-Star format to USA vs. the World ✍️ pic.twitter.com/QcJGB3kfL3
— Get Up (@GetUpESPN) February 18, 2025
Subban emphasized that hockey and basketball are fundamentally different sports, stating, “You can step on an NBA floor and go through the motions. You can’t do that in hockey.” This sparked debate, as critics could argue that players often coast through an NHL All-Star Game, echoing the same identity crisis the NBA is facing with low ratings, 3-on-3 tournaments, and a lack of intensity. While John Scott’s All-Star MVP was an extraordinary narrative, it stemmed from a meme campaign rather than the thrilling play we expect; there were no fights or fierce checks during last year’s Team McDavid vs Team Matthews game.
The current moment for hockey is deservedly spotlighted, but some of Subban’s cultural critiques might be exaggerated. However, his commentary on the NBA players’ engagement level in their All-Star game, compared to the commitment seen in the 4 Nations Face-Off, was spot on. “This was the most viewed game that we’ve had in years. It’s about pride, honor, and playing for your teammates. I have to ask NBA players, what are you playing for?”
He questioned the true motivations behind NBA players’ participation, pointing out the disparity between their earnings and the effort during All-Star events. “It’s not about the money; you’re already making it. Are you hurt or injured? In hockey, we play hurt and injured. That’s the culture,” Subban remarked. “Fans resonate with what’s real; they want to see you compete for your country and leave it all on the ice, especially when they’re paying to watch.” This comparison was highlighted further by Subban, who noted the dedication evident in the 4 Nations Face-Off as opposed to the apparent disengagement from certain NBA stars.
He posed a stark question: “When is the NBA going to embrace that culture?” Emphasizing the need for NBA players to give their all during games, he said the fans deserve to feel their attendance is worthwhile. “Right now, there’s a significant difference between the NHL’s approach and what the NBA is offering. The success of the 4 Nations derives from players who are all in,” he stated.
Ultimately, the key takeaway for sports fans is simple: if players care, then fans will care, irrespective of whether it’s an All-Star game, an international tournament, or an exhibition. The cultural disconnect can indeed manifest in basketball, as exemplified by the emotional responses from Team USA during the Summer Olympics and Kevin Durant’s heartfelt moment after winning a gold medal. However, at present, the NBA All-Star Game lacks this fervor.
The underlying issue for the NBA is that comparison narratives to the 4 Nations Face-Off could cement existing stereotypes, which might not favor basketball. Although NBA players do play through injuries when it matters, persistent instances of load management and lack of effort during the All-Star Game could further alienate fans. This negative cycle is a challenge the NBA and its players must confront.
